MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4290000979 · doi:10.5539/ijef.v14n9p1

Pollution, Production Efficiency and Economic Growth: A Synthesis

2022· article· en· W4290000979 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Chao Chiung Ting

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Economics and Finance · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicEnergy, Environment, Economic Growth
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsProduction (economics)ExternalityEconomicsPollutionMicroeconomicsPareto principleProduction–possibility frontierGovernment (linguistics)Economic interventionismPareto efficiencyIndustrial organizationEnvironmental economicsNatural resource economicsOperations management

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Production efficiency of the firm is defined to be the maximum ratio of output to input in this paper. When a society reaches Pareto optima, this society achieves its aggregative efficiency. If the firm does not produce efficiently, transformation rate on production frontier does not make any sense because production frontier can be extended if the firm improves its own production efficiency. Therefore, production efficiency of the firm is the necessary condition of Pareto optima. Since total input is equivalent to total cost in the sense of aggregating different inputs, the concept of production efficiency of the firm can be mathematically converted into minimum cost (i.e., minimum input). When input is minimized, pollution that arises from production is minimized, ether. Thus, pollution is minimized by the efficient firm while the firm grows efficiently. This conclusion implies that government intervention is unnecessary. Consequently, the primary policy to reduce pollution would be promoting anti-pollution technology and subsiding the firm to upgrade its equipment as well as improving production efficiency of the firm rather than charging Pigovian tax and enforcing government regulation except that minimum pollution makes people not endure or environment not sustain. To summarize, this paper integrates efficiency, externality (e.g., pollution), market mechanism (e.g., supply and demand), government intervention (e.g., Pigovian tax), increasing return to scale and economic growth into growth model of the firm by which we are capable to propose pollution policy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.028

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0050.006
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0040.004
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.188
Teacher spread0.175 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSystematic review
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Economics and FinanceSame topicEnergy, Environment, Economic GrowthFrench-language works237,207