Mapping Pulsatile Optic Nerve Head Deformation Using OCT
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objective To develop a noninvasive technique to quantitatively assess the pulsatile deformation due to cardiac contractions of the optic nerve head (ONH). Design Evaluation of a diagnostic test or technology. Participants Healthy subjects with no history of refractive surgery, divided into 2 cohorts on the basis of their axial length (AL). Methods We present a noninvasive technique to quantitatively assess the pulsatile deformation of the ONH tissue by combining high-frequency OCT imaging and widely available image processing algorithms. We performed a thorough validation of the approach, numerically and experimentally, evaluating the sensitivity of the method to artificially induced deformation and its robustness to different noise levels. We performed deformation measurements in cohorts of healthy (n = 9) and myopic (n = 5) subjects in different physiological strain conditions by calculating the amplitude of tissue displacement in both the primary position and abduction. The head rotation was measured using a goniometer. During imaging in abduction, the head was rotated 40° ± 3°, and subjects were instructed to direct their gaze toward the OCT visual target. Main Outcome Measures Pulsatile tissue displacement maps. Results The robustness of the method was assessed using artificial deformations and increasing noise levels. The results show acceptable absolute errors before the noise simulations grossly exaggerate image degradation. For the group of subjects with AL of < 25 mm (n = 9), the median pulsatile displacement of the ONH was 7.8 ± 1.3 μm in the primary position and 8.9 ± 1.2 μm in abduction. The Wilcoxon test showed a significant difference ( P ≤ 0.005) between the 2 paired measures. Reproducibility was tested in 2 different sessions in 5 different subjects with the same intraocular pressure, and an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.99 was obtained ( P < 0.005). Conclusions The computational pipeline demonstrated good reproducibility and had the capacity to accurately map the pulsatile deformation of the optic nerve. In a clinical setting, we detected physiological changes in normal subjects supporting its translation potential as a novel biomarker for the diagnosis and progression of optic nerve diseases.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".