Room-temperature atomic layer deposition of SiO2 on microcracked ZrO2 layers
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Yttria-stabilized zirconia (Y-SZ) has become a reliable material option to restore severely compromised teeth. Y-SZ materials are prone to low-temperature degradation (LTD), which generates a tetragonal-to-monoclinic ( t-m ) transformed, porous layer. We suggest that room-temperature atomic layer deposition (RT-ALD) could be used for the infiltration and deposition of nanoscale SiO 2 film over this layer, creating a protective hybrid surface against further degradation by LTD. This study investigated the potential of developing a Y-SZ transformed layer under controlled conditions for the infiltration of silica using RT-ALD, aiming to develop a hybrid zirconia-silica interface, and to investigate the effect of silica deposition/infiltration via RT-ALD on the surface roughness and wettability of zirconia-based materials. Sintered specimens (14 mm × 4 mm x 2 mm) were prepared from four different Y-SZ materials (n = 40): low translucency 3 mol % Y-SZ (3Y-LT; Ceramill ZI, Amann Girrbach); high translucency 4 mol % Y-SZ (4Y-HT; Ceramill Zolid); and two high translucency 5 mol % Y-SZ (5Y-HT – Lava Esthetic, 3M; 5Y-SHT – Ceramill Zolid, FX white). Specimens were exposed to hydrothermal treatment (HTT) to develop similar depths of crystalline changes. RT-ALD was used to deposit a thin film of silica (SiO 2 ). Surface roughness and wettability analyses were performed to investigate the effect of treatment (HTT and RT-ALD) and material on Y-SZ surface properties, and data was analyzed by two-way ANOVA and Tukey HSD ( p < 0.05). RT-ALD and HTT-RT-ALD treated specimens of 3Y-LT and 5Y-HT materials were exposed to further hydrothermal aging (HA) and the surface was characterized by time-of-flight secondary ion mass spectrometry (ToF-SIMS). There was a significant interaction effect of material and treatment (HTT and RT-ALD) on roughness ( p = 0.02), and surface wettability ( p < 0.001). Silica deposition via RT-ALD resulted in a significant increase in surface roughness of all materials tested, while surface wettability was either improved or not changed based on the material type and HTT exposure. Nanofilms of SiO 2 were successfully deposited on Y-SZ materials and infiltrated 3Y-LT zirconia.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".