Marsupial satellite DNA as faithful reflections of long-terminal repeat retroelement structure
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Long terminal repeat (LTR) retroelements, including endogenous retroviruses, are one of the origins of satellite DNAs. However, the vast majority of satellite DNAs originating from LTR retroelements consists of parts of the element. In addition, they frequently contain sequences unrelated to that element. Here we report a novel marsupial satellite DNA (named walbRep) that contains, and consists solely of, the entire sequence of an LTR retroelement (the walb element). As is common with LTR retroelements, walb copies exhibit length variation. We focused on the abundance of copies of a specific length (2.7 kb) in the genome of the red-necked wallaby. Cloning and analyses of long genomic DNA fragments revealed a satellite DNA in which the LTR sequence (0.4 kb) and the sequence of the internal region of a nonautonomous walb copy (2.3 kb) were repeated alternately. The junctions between these two components exhibited the same end-to-end arrangements as those in the walb element. This satellite organization could be accounted for by a simple formation model that includes slippage during chromosome pairing followed by homologous recombination but does not invoke any other types of rearrangements. We discuss the possible reasons why satellite DNAs having such structures are rarely found in mammals.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".