MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4290631010 · doi:10.1177/24741264221104592

Full-Thickness Macular Hole Due to Choroidal Neovascularization in the Setting of Pathologic Myopia

2022· article· en· W4290631010 on OpenAlexaff
Austin Pereira, Brian G. Ballios, David Sarraf, Peng Yan

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of VitreoRetinal Diseases · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRetinal and Macular Surgery
Canadian institutionsUniversity Health NetworkKensington HealthUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineOphthalmologyChoroidal neovascularizationOptical coherence tomographyRetinoschisisMacular holeFundus (uterus)Macular degenerationVisual acuityOptometryVitrectomyRetinalRetinal detachment

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Purpose: To present a case of myopic choroidal neovascularization (CNV) leading to a full-thickness macular hole (MH) in a patient with macular schisis. Methods: A single case was evaluated. Results: A 65-year-old woman presented with myopic staphyloma and foveoschisis in both eyes. One month after the baseline presentation for myopic macular schisis, the patient presented with a paracentral scotoma in the left eye. Examination showed a submacular hemorrhage in the left eye. Optical coherence tomography of the left eye showed subretinal fluid and subretinal hyperreflective material in the fovea, suggestive of exudative myopia, and a small full-thickness MH (diameter 86 µm). After anti-vascular endothelial growth factor injections, the CNV showed interval improvement; however, a larger full-thickness MH (diameter 287 µm) developed in the left eye. Conclusions: A full-thickness MH developed secondary to CNV, leading to foveal dehiscence in an eye with baseline macular schisis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.191
Threshold uncertainty score0.396

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.253
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of VitreoRetinal DiseasesSame topicRetinal and Macular SurgeryFrench-language works237,207