MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4290720574 · doi:10.3390/mi13081261

Stable and Fast Planar Jumping Control Design for a Compliant One-Legged Robot

2022· article· en· W4290720574 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueMicromachines · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicRobotic Locomotion and Control
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of ChinaNational Science Foundation
KeywordsJumpingControl theory (sociology)RobotInverted pendulumJumpInertiaLegged robotSlip (aerodynamics)SimulationTracking errorRobustness (evolution)Computer scienceEngineeringArtificial intelligenceControl (management)PhysicsNonlinear system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Compliant bipedal robots demonstrate a potential for impact resistance and high energy efficiency through the introduction of compliant elements. However, it also adds to the difficulty of stable control of the robot. To motivate the control strategies of compliant bipedal robots, this work presents an improved control strategy for the stable and fast planar jumping of a compliant one-legged robot designed by the authors, which utilizes the concept of the virtual pendulum. The robot was modeled as an extended spring-loaded inverted pendulum (SLIP) model with non-negligible torso inertia, leg inertia, and leg damping. To enable the robot to jump forward stably, a foot placement method was adopted, where due to the asymmetric feature of the extended SLIP model, a variable time coefficient and an integral term with respect to the forward speed tracking error were introduced to the method to accurately track a given forward speed. An energy-based leg rest length regulation method was used to compensate for the energy dissipation due to leg damping, where an integral term, regarding jumping height tracking error, was introduced to accurately track a given jumping height. Numerical simulations were conducted to validate the effectiveness of the proposed control strategy. Results show that stable and fast jumping of compliant one-legged robots could be achieved, and the desired forward speed and jumping height could also be accurately tracked. In addition to that, using the proposed control strategy, the robust jumping performance of the robot could be observed in the presence of disturbances from state variables or uneven terrain.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.969
Threshold uncertainty score0.624

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.211
Teacher spread0.191 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it