MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4290729333 · doi:10.3389/feart.2022.940799

Comparing Direct Numerical Modeling Predictions With Field Evidence for Methane Vertical Microseepage in Two Geological Settings

2022· article· en· W4290729333 on OpenAlexafffundabout
V. Costanzo-Álvarez, Jorge Mendoza, Milagrosa Aldana, Maria Jácome, Marisel Díaz, Keyla Ramírez, Cristina H. Amon

Bibliographic record

VenueFrontiers in Earth Science · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeophysical and Geoelectrical Methods
Canadian institutionsHumber PolytechnicUniversity of Toronto
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsGeologyMethaneBoreholeSoil scienceSoil waterPetroleumMineralogyGeotechnical engineeringChemistryPaleontology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The footprints of petroleum microseepage can be associated with chemical and microbial processes in initially homogeneous strata and/or with the fluid transport properties of the rocks through which oil and gas migrate. This work examines the role of such driving factors in two contrasting geological settings by comparing numerical modeling predictions for upward methane microseepage with some field evidence for hydrocarbons transport and accumulation. The two case studies are a monitoring borehole (BH8) from a landfill in southern Ontario, Canada, and an oil well (Saltarin 1A) from the Eastern Llanos Basin in Colombia. Profiles of relative methane concentrations versus depth were generated using a time-dependent, one-dimensional, simulation of the advection-diffusion equation applied to multiple strata of soils, and sediments. The model employs the layered sequences of these two geological settings. The results obtained hinge on the standard permeability values for the rock types involved and their corresponding flow velocities and diffusion coefficients. Resistivity logs were utilized as direct proxies of hydrocarbon concentrations. As additional evidence for petroleum microseepage, experiments of electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) were carried out in drilling cuts of Saltarin 1A to measure traces of organic matter free radicals concentrations (OMFRC). Extractable organic matter (EOM) and magnetic susceptibility data were also considered in interpreting the EPR results. Qualitative comparisons between modeled methane profiles and their corresponding resistivity logs suggest that microseepage and hydrocarbon accumulations are conditioned by the fluid transport properties of the rocks contained by BH8 and Saltarin 1A. Moreover, in most of the Saltarin 1A sequence, the OMFRC profiles follow the trends displayed by the resistivity and modeled methane logs. Thus, the EPR data also indicates that hydrocarbon microseepage and accumulation are largely controlled by lithology. Conversely, EOM and magnetic susceptibility appear to be evidence for hydrocarbon-mediated near-surface chemical processes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.393
Threshold uncertainty score0.447

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.287
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFrontiers in Earth ScienceSame topicGeophysical and Geoelectrical MethodsFrench-language works237,207