MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4290731474 · doi:10.1002/rra.4034

A contemporary estimate for the abundance of juvenile American Eel <i>Anguilla rostrata</i> attempting to migrate past a barrier in the Ottawa River

2022· article· en· W4290731474 on OpenAlexaffabout
Steven M. Woods, Shannon D. Bower, Nicolas W. R. Lapointe

Bibliographic record

VenueRiver Research and Applications · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicFish Ecology and Management Studies
Canadian institutionsCanadian Wildlife Federation
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAnguilla rostrataFisheryJuvenileAbundance (ecology)GeographyAnguillidaeSargasso seaPopulationBaseline (sea)EcologyOceanographyBiologyGeologyFish <Actinopterygii>Demography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract American Eel ( Anguilla rostrata ) travels from the Sargasso Sea to fresh waters of eastern North America and back in a lifetime, and once provided one of the most abundant eel fisheries in the world. Many American Eel populations are now at risk worldwide. Dams act as barriers to the upstream migration of juvenile American Eels, which can be partially mitigated by installing eel ladders. To inform mitigation decisions and provide baseline data, the number of eels approaching barriers should be estimated; however, estimation is difficult for this now rare and cryptic species, especially in large rivers. In St. Lawrence and Ottawa River system, American Eels are among the largest and most fecund of the species, and local populations in the Ottawa River are almost entirely composed of large, female eels. American Eel in this area has declined to less than 1% of historic abundance, yet no local population estimates are available to inform recovery strategies and management actions. We, therefore, evaluated data from an unpublished study to estimate the abundance of American Eel attempting to migrate upstream past a barrier. American Eels ( n = 339) were captured at the Carillon Generating Station over 36 days (July 12, 2010–August 17, 2010). Results were fit to the POPAN Jolly‐Seber model in program MARK. Future studies could be improved by sampling throughout the migration season and deploying multiple traps spanning downstream features. While confidence intervals in the best‐fitting model were wide, the estimate nonetheless provides a baseline to inform future work and management.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.042
Threshold uncertainty score0.768

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.331
Teacher spread0.295 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRiver Research and ApplicationsSame topicFish Ecology and Management StudiesFrench-language works237,207