Pengurusan Tingkah Laku dan Disiplin Pelajar di Sekolah Kebangsaan Bagan Datuk Perak
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Proses pengurusan tingkah laku dan disiplin di sekolah mempengaruhi sejauhmana keupayaan sesebuah sekolah untuk menerapkan nilai-nilai murni dalam diri pelajar. Kajian ini merangkumi objektif untuk mengenal pasti strategi-strategi yang digunakan oleh guru dalam pengurusan tingkah laku dan disiplin sekolah. Kajian ini dijalankan dengan menggunakan kaedah temu bual dengan salah seorang guru disiplin daripada sekolah yang terpilih. Dapatan kajian diolah dengan menggunakan analisis SWOT. Kajian mendapati bahawa peranan utama dalam menangani masalah tingkah laku dan disiplin murid ialah keluarga. Selain itu, pihak sekolah berperanan untuk menambah nilai pengajaran mata pelajaran iaitu menerapkan nilai-nilai murni dalam semua kelas. Pelajaran boleh dijalankan secara interaktif, memberikan murid lebih berminat untuk hadir ke sekolah dan meneruskan pelajaran. Unsur-unsur tema keagamaan dan kewarganegaraan perlu ada dalam semua mata pelajaran agar golongan muda diasuh dengan nilai-nilai murni dalam apa jua perkara yang dipelajari. Behavior Management and Student Discipline at Sekolah Kebangsaan Bagan Datuk Perak Abstract: The process of managing behavior and discipline at school affects the extent to which a school is capable of inculcating good values in students. This study includes the objective to identify the strategies used by teachers in the management of behavior and school discipline. This study was conducted by using the interview method with one of the discipline teachers from the selected school. Research findings are processed using SWOT analysis. The study found that the main role in dealing with student behavior and discipline problems is the family. In addition, the school plays a role in adding value to the teaching of subjects, i.e. applying good values in all classes. Lessons can be conducted interactively, giving students more interest in attending school and continuing their studies. The elements of religious and citizenship themes must be present in all subjects so that young people are nurtured with pure values in whatever they study. Keywords: Behavior Management and Discipline, SWOT, Teaching and Learning.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.032 | 0.008 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".