MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4290830064 · doi:10.1136/jnnp-2022-abn2.59

015 Service evaluation: the role of same day emergency care in managing acute neurological presentations

2022· article· en· W4290830064 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Catherine Hsu, Fatima-Zahra Elrhermoul, Chinedu Maduakor, Alex Everitt, Carolyn Gabriel

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Neurology Neurosurgery & Psychiatry · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRetinal and Optic Conditions
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineMedical emergencyEmergency departmentService (business)Quarter (Canadian coin)NeurologyCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)Emergency medicineAccident and emergencyNursingPsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background and aim During the COVID-19 pandemic, the neurology department at St Mary’s Hospital had to direct the bulk of its acute work to a newly expanded ‘hot clinic’ running Monday to Friday through Same Day Emergency Care (SDEC). Face to face clinic appointments were also halted and instead triaged to SDEC when examination of the patient was necessary. Patients were referred through a number of routes directly to the neurology consultants or on-call registrar, and subsequently seen on an urgent basis. We were interested in evaluating the types of referrals made to this service as well as their final outcomes. Results A total of 255 patients were seen between 3 March 2021 and 3 August 2021. Approximately a third were from the A&E department and just less than a third were from the Western Eye Hospital, our local ophthalmology A&E. Most referrals were for headache or visual change, and 61% of patients did not need to re-attend SDEC. Importantly, a quarter were discharged home after specialist review, and none required admission from clinic. Thus our emergency service was successful in avoiding admissions while ensuring patients received the care they required in a timely fashion.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.018

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.301
Teacher spread0.284 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Neurology Neurosurgery & PsychiatrySame topicRetinal and Optic ConditionsFrench-language works237,207