MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4290996429 · doi:10.1109/icc45855.2022.9839170

Intelligent Spectrum Sensing: An Unsupervised Learning Approach Based on Dimensionality Reduction

2022· article· en· W4290996429 on OpenAlexaff
Nada Abdel Khalek, Walaa Hamouda

Bibliographic record

VenueICC 2022 - IEEE International Conference on Communications · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicCognitive Radio Networks and Spectrum Sensing
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceCognitive radioArtificial intelligenceMachine learningDimensionality reductionOverhead (engineering)Principal component analysisUnsupervised learningSpectrum managementSupport vector machineSupervised learningReduction (mathematics)Artificial neural networkWireless

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In Cognitive radio (CR), users take advantage of vacant licensed bands to transmit their data as they become available. Cognitive users employ an autonomous perception-action decision cycle that starts with sensing the activity of licensed users. By using machine learning techniques, CR users can attain their full cognitive potential and smartly detect empty frequency bands. Learning-based CR systems that utilize supervised learning for spectrum sensing require labeled data for model training. Having readily accessible labeled data is a challenging task for CR networks, since it necessitates cooperation between licensed and unlicensed users. In interweave CR networks, such cooperation is not feasible and imposes a significant communication overhead. Motivated by the above, we address the practical limitation of labeled data scarcity in learning-based CR networks by designing a novel unsupervised learning framework for cooperative spectrum sensing based on a Gaussian mixture model (GMM) and principal component analysis (PCA) that uses a small amount of unlabeled data for training and requires no prior knowledge of the radio environment. The system is mathematically simulated, and its performance is evaluated based on various detection performance metrics. According to our findings, our proposed approach outperforms the GMM algorithm and is on par with supervised learning algorithms such as SVM, RF, and DT. Furthermore, the proposed approach is shown to be robust to low SNRs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.107
GPT teacher head0.326
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations15
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueICC 2022 - IEEE International Conference on CommunicationsSame topicCognitive Radio Networks and Spectrum SensingFrench-language works237,207