MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4290996995 · doi:10.1109/icc45855.2022.9839161

Arbitration Mechanisms for Multiple Entry Capability in PBFT for IoT Systems

2022· article· en· W4290996995 on OpenAlex
Vojislav B. Mišić, Jelena Mišić, Xiaolin Chang

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueICC 2022 - IEEE International Conference on Communications · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicDistributed systems and fault tolerance
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsByzantine fault toleranceComputer scienceArbitrationDistributed computingIndependence (probability theory)Computer networkFault toleranceComputer security

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Practical Byzantine Fault Tolerance (PBFT) is a widely used consensus protocol which is sensitive to malicious behavior of the designated leader. In this paper we discuss two mechanisms that allow any ordering node on the consensus committee to act as the leader, thus alleviating the dependency on the leader. The selection of the next leader is performed by arbitration, rather than through a predefined sequence or round-robin mechanism. As the result, the proposed mechanisms lead to improved security since a malicious leader cannot stall the consensus and the next leader is not known beforehand. Performance evaluation shows that the proposed mechanisms indeed offer independence of the chosen leader and a reduction of queuing times of client proposals, albeit with some performance degradation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.976
Threshold uncertainty score0.720

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0030.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.104
GPT teacher head0.343
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it