Risk of Ocular Adverse Events With Taxane-Based Chemotherapy
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Importance: Taxane-based chemotherapy agents, such as docetaxel and paclitaxel, are used for treating a wide range of cancers. Although much has been published on adverse events related to taxanes, data on ocular outcomes with these very important drugs are scant. Objective: To quantify the risk of 3 mutually exclusive ocular adverse events of epiphora, cystoid macular edema (CME), and optic neuropathy with taxane-based chemotherapy agents by undertaking a large pharmacoepidemiologic study. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective cohort study design used a private health-claims database from the US that captures health information of more than 150 million enrollees. The study team created a cohort of new users of women with cancer who were taking taxane-based chemotherapy (docetaxel or paclitaxel) and new users of tamoxifen as controls. Study members were observed to the first incidence of each of the 3 mutually exclusive outcomes. An analysis of taxane-only users was also undertaken. Exposure: Tamoxifen (unexposed) and taxanes (ie, paclitaxel and docetaxel) as the exposed. Main Outcomes and Measures: First diagnosis of (1) epiphora, (2) cystoid macular edema (CME), or (3) optic neuropathy ascertained using International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, Ninth Revision or International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, Tenth Revision. Results: Among the 18 219 users in the epiphora analysis and optic neuropathy analysis, there were 1824 taxane users (paclitaxel and docetaxel) (age, mean [SD], 62.1 [12.7] years) and 16 395 tamoxifen users (age, mean [SD], 54.6 [12.8] years), respectively. The crude hazard ratio (HR) for epiphora was 5.55 (95% CI, 2.99-10.29) and adjusted HR was 5.15 (95% CI, 2.79-9.54). For optic neuropathy, the crude HR was 4.43 (95% CI, 1.10-17.82) and the adjusted HR was 4.44 (95% CI, 1.04-18.87). Among the 18 433 users in the CME analysis, there were 1909 taxane users (paclitaxel and docetaxel) (age, mean [SD], 62.5 years) and 16 524 tamoxifen users (age, mean [SD], 54.6 years). The crude HR for CME comparing taxane users with tamoxifen users was 1.37 (95% CI, 0.72-2.60) and adjusted HR was 1.33 (95% CI, 0.70-2.53). The HRs for epiphora and CME in the taxane cohort during the time of exposure compared with the period prior to use of the drugs were 2.86 (95% CI, 1.11-7.39) and 2.27 (95% CI, 0.68-7.54), respectively. Conclusions and Relevance: In a cohort of women who were using taxane chemotherapy agents, there was an association with elevated risk for epiphora, CME, and optic neuropathy. Ophthalmologists and oncologists should be aware of these adverse events in women with breast cancer who receive these drugs.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".