MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4291145850 · doi:10.1038/s41591-022-01951-8

Publisher Correction: Reporting guideline for the early-stage clinical evaluation of decision support systems driven by artificial intelligence: DECIDE-AI

2022· erratum· en· W4291145850 on OpenAlexaff
Baptiste Vasey, Myura Nagendran, B. A. Campbell, David A. Clifton, Gary S. Collins, Spiros Denaxas, Alastair K. Denniston, Livia Faes, Bart Geerts, Mudathir Ibrahim, Xiaoxuan Liu, Bilal A. Mateen, Piyush Mathur, Melissa D. McCradden, Lauren Morgan, Johan Ordish, Campbell Rogers, Suchi Saria, Daniel Ting, Peter Watkinson, Wim Weber, Peter Wheatstone, Peter McCulloch, Aaron Lee, Alan G. Fraser, Ali Connell, Alykhan Vira, Andre Esteva, Andrew D. Althouse, Andrew L. Beam, Anne de Hond, Anne‐Laure Boulesteix, Anthony Bradlow, Ari Ercole, Arsenio Páez, Athanasios Tsanas, Barry Kirby, Ben Glocker, Carmelo Velardo, Chang Min Park, Charisma Hehakaya, Chris Baber, Chris Paton, Christian Johner, Christopher Kelly, Christopher Yau, Clare McGenity, Constantine Gatsonis, Corinne Faivre‐Finn, Crispin Simon, Danielle Sent, Danilo Bzdok, Darren Treanor, David Wong, David F. Steiner, David Higgins, Dawn Benson, Declan P. O’Regan, Dinesh V. Gunasekaran, Dominic Danks, Emanuele Neri, Evangelia Kyrimi, Falk Schwendicke, Farah Magrabi, Frances Ives, Frank Rademakers, G Fowler, Giuseppe Frau, Henry David Jeffry Hogg, Hani J. Marcus, Heang‐Ping Chan, Henry Xiang, Hugh McIntyre, Hugh Harvey, Hyungjin Kim, Ibrahim Habli, James C. Fackler, James H. Shaw, Janet Higham, Jared M. Wohlgemut, Jaron Chong, Jean‐Emmanuel Bibault, Jérémie F. Cohen, Jesper Kers, Jessica Morley, Joachim Krois, João Monteiro, Joel Horovitz, John Fletcher, Jonathan Taylor, Jung Hyun Yoon, Karandeep Singh, Karel G. M. Moons, Kassandra Karpathakis, Ken Catchpole, Kerenza Hood, Konstantinos Balaskas, Konstantinos Kamnitsas, Laura G. Militello, Laure Wynants, Lauren Oakden‐Rayner, Laurence Lovat, Luc Smits, Ludwig Christian Hinske, M. Khair ElZarrad, Maarten van Smeden, Mara Giavina‐Bianchi, Mark Daley, Mark Sendak, Mark Sujan, Maroeska M. Rovers, Matthew DeCamp, Mark Woodward, Matthieu Komorowski, Max Marsden, Maxine Mackintosh, Michael D. Abràmoff, Miguel Ángel Armengol de la Hoz, Neale Hambidge, Neil Daly, Niels Peek, Oliver Redfern, Omer F. Ahmad, Patrick M. Bossuyt, Pearse A. Keane, Pedro Ferreira, Petra Schnell‐Inderst, Pietro Mascagni, Prokar Dasgupta, Pujun Guan, Rachel Barnett, Rawen Kader, Reena Chopra, Ritse M. Mann, Rupa Sarkar, Saana M. Mäenpää, Samuel G. Finlayson, Sarah Vollam, Sebastian J. Vollmer, Seong Ho Park, Shakir Laher, Shalmali Joshi, Siri Lise van der Meijden, Susan C. Shelmerdine, Tien‐En Tan, Tom J. W. Stocker, Valentina Giannini, Vince I. Madai, Virginia Newcombe, Wei Yan Ng, Wendy Rogers, William Ogallo, Yoonyoung Park, Zane Perkins

Bibliographic record

VenueNature Medicine · 2022
Typeerratum
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Canadian institutionsWestern UniversityMila - Quebec Artificial Intelligence InstituteHospital for Sick ChildrenPublic Health OntarioUniversity of Toronto
FundersNational Medical Research CouncilSingHealth FoundationAgency for Science, Technology and ResearchAcademy of Medical SciencesNational Institute for Health and Care ResearchAlan Turing Institute
KeywordsGuidelineStage (stratigraphy)Computer scienceArtificial intelligenceClinical decision support systemDecision support systemMedicinePathologyBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.021
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.248
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: Reporting · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.979
Threshold uncertainty score0.233

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0210.248
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.003
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0050.005
Bibliometrics0.0080.006
Science and technology studies0.0060.005
Scholarly communication0.0110.004
Open science0.0080.003
Research integrity0.0200.027
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0700.064

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.270
GPT teacher head0.545
Teacher spread0.275 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
DomainReporting
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueNature MedicineSame topicArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare and EducationFrench-language works237,207