Understanding adolescent mental health and well-being: a qualitative study of school stakeholders’ perspectives to inform intervention development
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract There has been an increasing prevalence of mental health issues among adolescents. Early interventions in the school setting have been identified as a way to help reduce and prevent these issues. However, the input of key school stakeholders is largely neglected within the intervention development process. This study aims to address this deficit by exploring student and teacher perspectives on adolescent mental health and the barriers and facilitators to intervention development. Data were collected through six focus groups with 32 students and seven semi-structured interviews with teachers were conducted in one secondary school in Northern Ireland, alongside observations across the whole school. The data were analysed using thematic analysis. The main themes identified were Test anxiety as a detrimental factor to adolescent mental health particularly within the school setting. and the use of a multi-component intervention involving communication, education and physical activity could help reduce anxiety and improve well-being. Perceived facilitators for intervention development were co-production, pupil ownership and target age while barriers included the school’s role in mental health prevention, mixed interests of adolescents, and time constraints. Issues such as test anxiety are important factors to consider in designing a school-based intervention. A school-based intervention should be multi-dimensional to allow the programme to be tailored and sustainable for the school setting. Future research with a larger representative sample is required to obtain information on the acceptance of the intervention developed from this research.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".