The Impact of Brief Monocular Retinal Inactivation on the Central Visual System During Postnatal Development
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract During a critical period of postnatal life, monocular deprivation (MD) of kittens by eyelid closure reduces the size of neurons in layers of the dorsal lateral geniculate nucleus (dLGN) connected to the deprived eye, and shifts cortical ocular dominance in favor of the non-deprived eye, modeling deprivation amblyopia in humans. Following long-term MD, temporary retinal inactivation of the non-deprived eye with microinjection of tetrodotoxin can promote superior recovery from MD, and at older ages, in comparison to conventional occlusion therapy. This suggests that monocular inactivation (MI) is a more potent approach to producing neural plasticity than occlusion. In the current study we assessed the modification of neuron size in the dLGN as a means of measuring the impact of a brief period of MI imposed at different ages during postnatal development. The biggest impact of inactivation was observed when it occurred at the peak of the critical period for ocular dominance plasticity. The effect of MI was evident in both the binocular and monocular segments of the dLGN, distinguishing it from MD that produces changes only within the binocular segment. With increasing age, the capacity for inactivation to alter postsynaptic cell size diminished but was still significant beyond the classic critical period. In comparison to MD, inactivation consistently produced effects that were about double in magnitude, and inactivation exhibited efficacy to produce neural modifications at older ages than MD. Notwithstanding the large neural alterations precipitated by inactivation, its anatomical effects were remediated with a short period of binocular visual experience, and vision through the previously inactivated eye fully recovered after washout of TTX. Our results demonstrate that MI is a potent means of modifying the visual pathway, and does so beyond the age at which occlusion is effective. The magnitude and longevity of inactivation to evoke neural modification highlights its potential to ameliorate disorders of the visual system such as amblyopia.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".