MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4291368088 · doi:10.14740/cr1405

Atrial Fibrillation as a Prognostic Indicator in Patients With Orthostatic Hypotension: Nationwide Inpatient Sample Analysis

2022· article· en· W4291368088 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Ahmed Brgdar, John Gharbin, Ahmad Awan, Richard Ogunti, Qasim Khurshid, Mayar Hamad, Prafulla Mehrotra

Bibliographic record

VenueCardiology Research · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiovascular Syncope and Autonomic Disorders
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineAtrial fibrillationOrthostatic vital signsInternal medicineCardiologyInterquartile rangeCohortCoronary artery diseaseHeart failureBlood pressure

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Orthostatic hypotension and atrial fibrillation have common etiology and a bidirectional relationship with several cardiovascular conditions. Despite both conditions being highly prevalent in hospitalized patients, prior research has primarily evaluated adverse outcomes due to orthostatic hypotension and atrial fibrillation independent of each other. In this study, we aim to assess if the presence of atrial fibrillation exacerbates in-hospital outcomes of patients with orthostatic hypotension. Methods: Adult patients hospitalized in 2019 with a primary diagnosis of orthostatic hypotension with or without pre-existing atrial fibrillation were identified using the International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision (ICD-10) code. The primary outcome of interest was in-patient mortality and cardiac arrest. Secondary outcomes of interest were the length of stay and total hospital charges. Adjusted and unadjusted analysis was performed on appropriate variables of interest. Results: Among 10,630 hospitalizations with orthostatic hypotension, 2,987 (median (interquartile range (IQR)) age: 78.5 (68.5 - 88.5) years; 1,197 women (40.1%)) comprised the atrial fibrillation cohort. Mean Charlson comorbidity index was noted to be significantly higher in orthostatic hypotension and atrial fibrillation patients (mean (standard deviation (SD)): 3.1 (2.1) vs. 2.5 (2.1), P < 0.001).Compared to orthostatic hypotension patients without atrial fibrillation, the prevalence of congestive heart failure (1,263 (42.3%) vs. 1,367 (17.9%)), coronary artery disease (1,432 (47.9%) vs. 2,481 (32.5%)), history of percutaneous coronary intervention or graft (443 (14.83%) vs. 860 (11.3%)), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (644 (21.6%) vs. 1,131 (14.8%)) , chronic kidney disease (1,182 (39.6%) vs. 2,216 (29.0%)), and hyperlipidemia (1,828 (61.2%) vs. 4,087 (53.5%); all P < 0.05), were significantly higher in orthostatic hypotension patients with atrial fibrillation. Following multivariable analysis of orthostatic hypotension patients, atrial fibrillation was associated with 5.0 times greater odds for cardiac arrest (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) = 5.0 (95% confidence interval (CI): 1.4 - 18.2), P = 0.014), without increased risk of in-hospital mortality (aOR = 2.1 (95% CI: 0.9 - 5.0), P = 0.090). Conclusions: Atrial fibrillation is an independent predictor for cardiac arrest but not in-hospital mortality in patients with orthostatic hypotension. The short- and long-term prognostic value of atrial fibrillation in orthostatic hypotension patients must be confirmed in future prospective trials to improve patient outcomes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score0.403

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.308
Teacher spread0.285 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCardiology ResearchSame topicCardiovascular Syncope and Autonomic DisordersFrench-language works237,207