Ceramics of the early-middle Neolithic of Vodla V settlement in east Karelia
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to consider the contacts between the carriers of Sperrings ceramics, pit-comb ceramics and Kargopol type ceramics on the example of materials from the early Middle Neolithic settlement of Vodla V. Sperrings ceramics dates back to the beginning of the IV millennium BC, as indicated by ornamentation, as well as traces of the influence of Karelian pit-comb ceramics and Kargopol ware. The complex of pit-comb ceramics can be attributed to the early phase of culture, however, based on new AMS definitions, the time of its existence can be dated to a later time the second quarter the middle of the IV millennium BC. The presence of vessels in the complex of Karelian pit-comb ceramics with traces of the influence of the Kargopol ornamental tradition on it also indicates the penetration of the territory of Eastern Karelia in the Neolithic of alien groups of the population with Kargopol type dishes, which is an independent type of ceramics based on its large number and presence in twenty settlements of Vodlozero Lake. In general, questions remain open about the territorial boundaries of the distribution of Karelian pit-comb ceramics and Kargopol ware, their interactions and chronological frameworks, which require processing and research of a huge block of ceramic materials of Eastern Karelia and the Southeastern Prionezhye.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".