MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4291653035 · doi:10.1109/tbcas.2022.3198911

An Implantable Optogenetic Neuro-Stimulator SoC With Extended Optical Pulse-Width Enabled by Supply-Variation-Immune Cycled Light-Toggling Stimulation

2022· article· en· W4291653035 on OpenAlexafffund
Tayebeh Yousefi, Ksenia Timonina, Georg Zoidl, Hossein Kassiri

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Biomedical Circuits and Systems · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicPhotoreceptor and optogenetics research
Canadian institutionsYork University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCMC Microsystems
KeywordsCapacitorChipElectrical engineeringComputer scienceOptogeneticsMaterials scienceElectronic engineeringVoltageEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The design, development, and experimental validation of an inductively-powered four-channel optical neuro-stimulator system on a chip (SoC) with on-chip neural recording, temperature monitoring, signal processing, and bidirectional wireless data communication are presented. A biologically-inspired optical stimulation approach is employed that extends the limitations on the stimulation pulse-width and frequency (i.e., enabling wirelessly-powered optical stimulation at very low frequencies (e.g.,$< $10 Hz)) while significantly reducing the required on-device storage capacitor size. The biological efficacy of the proposed approach is validated and compared with conventional stimulation through in vitro experiments. The stimulator's energy efficiency is enhanced by employing a high-gain (850 A/A) current amplifier/driver in each channel that steers up to 10 mA into the optical source with an excellent linearity ($|INL|< $0.5LSB), while 1) yielding the lowest-in-literature required voltage headroom, and 2) being insensitive to large (up to 12%) supply voltage drops, which is ideal for battery-less implantable devices. Additionally, to maximize the percentage of the generated optical power that reaches the targeted cells (thus, further energy efficiency enhancement), inkjet printing is utilized to fabricate custom-designed optical$\mu$lenses that are placed directly on top of the silicon SoC to enhance the generated light's directivity by >$30\times$. An electrophysiological recording channel for real-time monitoring of the stimulation efficacy and a high-precision (0.1$^{\circ }$C resolution) temperature readout circuit for shutting off stimulation upon detection of an unsafe temperature increase are also integrated on the chip. Additionally, the SoC hosts an ASK receiver and an LSK transmitter for downlink and uplink wireless data communication, respectively. The SoC is fabricated in a standard 130 nm CMOS process and occupies 6 mm$^{2}$. Measurement results for different sensory and communication blocks are presented, as well as in vitro experimental validation results showing simultaneous optical stimulation, electrical recording, and calcium imaging.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.272
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Biomedical Circuits and SystemsSame topicPhotoreceptor and optogenetics researchFrench-language works237,207