An Implantable Optogenetic Neuro-Stimulator SoC With Extended Optical Pulse-Width Enabled by Supply-Variation-Immune Cycled Light-Toggling Stimulation
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The design, development, and experimental validation of an inductively-powered four-channel optical neuro-stimulator system on a chip (SoC) with on-chip neural recording, temperature monitoring, signal processing, and bidirectional wireless data communication are presented. A biologically-inspired optical stimulation approach is employed that extends the limitations on the stimulation pulse-width and frequency (i.e., enabling wirelessly-powered optical stimulation at very low frequencies (e.g., <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><tex-math notation="LaTeX">$< $</tex-math></inline-formula> 10 Hz)) while significantly reducing the required on-device storage capacitor size. The biological efficacy of the proposed approach is validated and compared with conventional stimulation through in vitro experiments. The stimulator's energy efficiency is enhanced by employing a high-gain (850 A/A) current amplifier/driver in each channel that steers up to 10 mA into the optical source with an excellent linearity ( <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><tex-math notation="LaTeX">$|INL|< $</tex-math></inline-formula> 0.5LSB), while 1) yielding the lowest-in-literature required voltage headroom, and 2) being insensitive to large (up to 12%) supply voltage drops, which is ideal for battery-less implantable devices. Additionally, to maximize the percentage of the generated optical power that reaches the targeted cells (thus, further energy efficiency enhancement), inkjet printing is utilized to fabricate custom-designed optical <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><tex-math notation="LaTeX">$\mu$</tex-math></inline-formula> lenses that are placed directly on top of the silicon SoC to enhance the generated light's directivity by > <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><tex-math notation="LaTeX">$30\times$</tex-math></inline-formula> . An electrophysiological recording channel for real-time monitoring of the stimulation efficacy and a high-precision (0.1 <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><tex-math notation="LaTeX">$^{\circ }$</tex-math></inline-formula> C resolution) temperature readout circuit for shutting off stimulation upon detection of an unsafe temperature increase are also integrated on the chip. Additionally, the SoC hosts an ASK receiver and an LSK transmitter for downlink and uplink wireless data communication, respectively. The SoC is fabricated in a standard 130 nm CMOS process and occupies 6 mm <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><tex-math notation="LaTeX">$^{2}$</tex-math></inline-formula> . Measurement results for different sensory and communication blocks are presented, as well as in vitro experimental validation results showing simultaneous optical stimulation, electrical recording, and calcium imaging.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it