MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4291670402 · doi:10.1101/2022.08.09.503242

Disabling of ARC1 through CRISPR/CAS9 leads to a complete breakdown of self-incompatibility responses in <i>Brassica napus</i>

2022· preprint· en· W4291670402 on OpenAlexaff
Kumar Abhinandan, Neil M.N. Hickerson, Xingguo Lan, Marcus A. Samuel

Bibliographic record

VenuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · 2022
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicPlant Reproductive Biology
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBrassicaceaeBrassicaMutantBiologyChemistryGeneticsBotanyGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Self-incompatibility (SI) is a genetic mechanism utilized by many flowering plants to promote outcrossing by recognizing and rejecting self-pollen. While the molecular mechanisms controlling SI can differ in various families, plants in the Brassicaceae family have been found to regulate SI through a S-haplotype-specific receptor-ligand interaction. The recognition of self-pollen leads to the activation of ARMADILLO-REPEAT-CONTAINING1 (ARC1), an E3 ligase which is thought to degrade the compatibility factors required for pollen germination, thus resulting in SI. However, the role of ARC1 in SI in the Brassicaceae family has been disputed within the scientific community. While various studies demonstrate that the manipulation of ARC1 and its downstream targets can break-down the SI response, others show that the SI phenotype can be imparted to self-compatible cultivars without the ARC1 gene. This study investigated the involvement of ARC1 in SI through the generation of loss-of-function ARC1 mutants using CRISPR-Cas9 in B. napus. Loss of ARC1 resulted in complete breakdown of SI in two different S-haplotypes providing strong evidence for the essential nature of ARC1 for mounting a successful SI response.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.056
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.263
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)Same topicPlant Reproductive BiologyFrench-language works237,207