Seismic monitoring using compact phased arrays: CO2 sequestration monitoring
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A network of passive, persistent, permanent, compact volumetric phased arrays (e.g. SADAR® arrays, Nyffenegger et al., 2022) features multiple technical advantages for monitoring seismic activity at and around CO2 injection and storage sites compared to a traditional surface network or downhole sensor strings at the depth of a reservoir. A limited demonstration network was installed at Carbon Management Canada’s (CMC) Containment and Monitoring Institute (CaMI) Field Research Station, and analysis of the acquired data has produced an event bulletin covering ∼80 days. Coherent processing (i.e. beamforming) of the acquired data increases the SNR allowing detection and localization of 406 subsurface microseismic events down to moment magnitude Mw = -3 within the network geographical extent. Analyst vetting of these events indicates that the signals typically exhibit clear onset of P waves in the optimal beam, enabling arrival time picking with a lower uncertainty than for the shear waves that dominate the records observed by other surface networks. In addition, using the optimal beam attributes associated to the event phase arrivals allows identifying signals arriving from below and exterior to the network’s coverage (e.g., episodic low-frequency tremor), potentially associated with other natural or man-made seismicity also worth monitoring.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".