Targeting of microvillus protein Eps8 by the NleH effector kinases from enteropathogenic <i>E. coli</i>
Bibliographic record
Abstract
(EPEC) requires the EPEC type III secretion system (T3SS). Two T3SS effectors injected into the host cell during infection are the atypical kinases, NleH1 and NleH2. However, the host targets of NleH1 and NleH2 kinase activity during infection have not been reported. Here phosphoproteomics identified Ser775 in the microvillus protein Eps8 as a bona fide target of NleH1 and NleH2 phosphorylation. Both kinases interacted with Eps8 through previously unrecognized, noncanonical "proline-rich" motifs, PxxDY, that bound the Src Homology 3 (SH3) domain of Eps8. Structural analysis of the Eps8 SH3 domain bound to a peptide containing one of the proline-rich motifs from NleH showed that the N-terminal part of the peptide adopts a type II polyproline helix, and its C-terminal "DY" segment makes multiple contacts with the SH3 domain. Ser775 phosphorylation by NleH1 or NleH2 hindered Eps8 bundling activity and drove dispersal of Eps8 from the AE lesion during EPEC infection. This finding suggested that NleH1 and NleH2 altered the cellular localization of Eps8 and the cytoskeletal composition of AE lesions during EPEC infection.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".