The impacts of knowledge management enablers and knowledge management processes on university performance in Vietnam
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Despite the abundance of literature on university performance (UP), few studies have examined the impacts of knowledge management (KM) enablers and KM processes on UP. This study introduces a model explaining the variance in UP, including KM enablers, which include organisational enablers (OEs) and personal enablers (PEs) as indirect determinants, and KM processes as direct determinants. Data from 296 Vietnamese university lecturers and managerial staff indicated that KM processes mediate the link between KM and UP. However, OEs and PEs had unequal impacts on KM processes. Of the three OE components, organisational rewards and culture had a direct impact on KM, while organisational leadership had an indirect impact through the two other processes. Of the two PE components, knowledge self-efficacy had a significant influence on KM. The findings indicate ways for Vietnamese universities to enhance performance and thus develop sustainably.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.018 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.007 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.006 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it