MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4292120603 · doi:10.1145/3558053.3558055

SAGA-net

2022· article· en· W4292120603 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueACM SIGAPP Applied Computing Review · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
Topic3D Shape Modeling and Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceBenchmark (surveying)GridArtificial intelligenceRepresentation (politics)GraphConvolution (computer science)Artificial neural networkFeature (linguistics)EncoderObject (grammar)Pattern recognition (psychology)Theoretical computer scienceMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, we propose a real-time shape-assisted graph attention neural network to perform local pointcloud repairment. The orderless pointclouds require an effective shape encoder to distill local and global geometric feature descriptors. Previous work has attempted to convert pointcloud representation into a voxelized shape or perform grid-transformations. While these approaches can subsequently allow common convolution operations on the structured data, they either pose additional computational cost or disrupt the local geometric information. We present SAGA-Net, an efficient graph attention neural network framework with a prior shape inquiry protocol that effectively extracts local geometric information, locates the descriptor for the missing region and accurately reconstructs the local region in a real-time manner. Our framework has been validated on a benchmark dataset, ShapeNet. We demonstrate that our framework can repair each partial pointcloud with accuracy surpassing other frameworks in most object categories, and improve the computational efficiency by orders of magnitude in terms of time cost.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.927
Threshold uncertainty score0.778

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.229
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it