MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4292170476 · doi:10.1002/dvdy.525

Spontaneous neuronal regeneration in the forebrain of the leopard gecko (<scp><i>Eublepharis macularius</i></scp>) following neurochemical lesioning

2022· article· en· W4292170476 on OpenAlexafffund
Laura Austin, Chloe Graham, Matthew K. Vickaryous

Bibliographic record

VenueDevelopmental Dynamics · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNeurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsBiologyNeurogenesisForebrainNeural stem cellNeuroscienceNeuNSubgranular zoneCell biologySubventricular zoneStem cellCentral nervous systemImmunology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Neurogenesis is the ability to generate new neurons from resident stem/progenitor populations. Although often understood as a homeostatic process, several species of teleost fish, salamanders, and lacertid lizards are also capable of reactive neurogenesis, spontaneously replacing lost or damaged neurons. Here, we demonstrate that reactive neurogenesis also occurs in a distantly related lizard species, Eublepharis macularius, the leopard gecko. RESULTS: To initiate reactive neurogenesis, the antimetabolite 3-acetylpyridine (3-AP) was administered. Four days following 3-AP administration there is a surge in neuronal cell death within a region of the forebrain known as the medial cortex (homolog of the mammalian hippocampal formation). Neuronal cell death is accompanied by a shift in resident microglial morphology and an increase neural stem/progenitor cell proliferation. By 30 days following 3-AP administration, the medial cortex was entirely repopulated by NeuN+ neurons. At the same time, local microglia have reverted to a resting state and cell proliferation by neural stem/progenitors has returned to levels comparable with uninjured controls. CONCLUSIONS: Together, these data provide compelling evidence of reactive neurogenesis in leopard geckos, and indicate that the ability of lizards to spontaneously replace lost or damaged forebrain neurons is more taxonomically widespread and evolutionarily conserved than previously considered.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.037
Threshold uncertainty score0.777

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.218
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDevelopmental DynamicsSame topicNeurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanismsFrench-language works237,207