MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4292227821 · doi:10.1021/acs.iecr.2c01855

New Photoelectrochemical Reactor for Hydrogen Generation: Experimental Investigation

2022· article· en· W4292227821 on OpenAlexaff
Ali Erdogan Karaca, İbrahim Dinçer

Bibliographic record

VenueIndustrial & Engineering Chemistry Research · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnergy
TopicAdvanced Photocatalysis Techniques
Canadian institutionsOntario Tech University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhotoelectrolysisPhotocurrentHydrogen productionElectrolysisLight intensityLinear sweep voltammetryElectrodeMaterials scienceAuxiliary electrodeHydrogenPhotoelectrochemical cellTitanium dioxidePhotoelectrochemistryAnalytical Chemistry (journal)Working electrodeCyclic voltammetryElectrolyteElectrochemistryChemistryOptoelectronicsOpticsComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In the scope of this study, a new photoelectrochemical (PEC) reactor, comprising a novel geometry for effective absorption of sunlight, is developed conceptually, and tested and assessed experimentally. The conic mesh structure of the photoelectrode offers maximizing the performance via passive tracking of solar light during daylight. In sequence, electrodeposition and sol–gel dip coating techniques are practiced, fabricating a copper oxide semiconductor as a working electrode and a titanium dioxide-coated electrode as the counter electrode. The new reactor concept is experimentally assessed for various conditions through electrochemical tests including open circuit potential, linear sweep voltammetry, cyclic voltammetry, and PWR potentiostatic tests. Energy and exergy efficiencies and hydrogen production rates are evaluated for various experimental conditions implying with and without light. The highest hydrogen production rate corresponding to 4.48 μg H 2 /s at near-atmospheric conditions (25 °C temperature and 101.3 kPa pressure) is obtained with the applied external bias of 2.25 V, where the reactor operates under artificial solar light with an intensity of 1000 W/m 2 . The produced photocurrent density is determined to be 1.81 mA/cm 2, corresponding to a photo-conversion efficiency of 1.84%. For these operational conditions, the energetic and exergetic efficiencies of the reactor are evaluated as 0.866 and 0.878%, respectively. Without light case, the PEC reactor acting as an electrolyzer operates with energetic and exergetic electrolysis efficiencies of 56.51 and 54.38%, respectively.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.118
GPT teacher head0.352
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIndustrial & Engineering Chemistry ResearchSame topicAdvanced Photocatalysis TechniquesFrench-language works237,207