Identification of divergent botulinum neurotoxin homologs in <i>Paeniclostridium ghonii</i>
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Botulinum neurotoxins (BoNTs) are the most potent family of toxins known to science. Bioinformatic studies in recent years have revealed that they are members of a broader toxin family, with an increasing number of divergent homologs identified in genomes of organisms outside of the Clostridium genus. Here, we report the identification of two putative divergent BoNT-like homologs in the genomes of two strains of Paeniclostridium ghonii . We designated them PG-toxin 1 (PGT1) and PG-toxin 2 (PGT2), which share ~54% protein sequence identity. Unlike any other known BoNT homologs, PGT1 and PGT2 are composed of two separate subunits encoded on two neighboring genes: one encoding the protease domain (light chain, LC) with a conserved HExxH motif, and the second encoding the heavy-chain (HC) containing the putative translocation domain and receptor-binding domain. Phylogenetic analysis of both the LC and HC reveal that it is a divergent member of the lineage of BoNT that also includes BoNT/X, BoNT/En and the insecticidal PMP1. The gene clusters harboring PGT1 and PGT2 also include a putative insecticidal delta-endotoxin, Cry8Ea1, as well as putative endolysin and bacteriocin genes that may facilitate lytic toxin secretion, suggesting a possibility that this gene cluster might serve an insecticidal purpose.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".