MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

A replicable, open-source, data integration method to support national practice-based research & quality improvement systems

2022· article· en· W4292254877 on OpenAlexaff
Marta Fernandes, Maria A. Donahue, Daniel B. Hoch, Sydney S. Cash, Sahar F. Zafar, Claire S. Jacobs, Mackenzie Hosford, P. Emanuela Voinescu, Brandy Fureman, Jeffrey Buchhalter, Christopher M. McGraw, M. Brandon Westover, Lidia M.V.R. Moura

Bibliographic record

VenueEpilepsy Research · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicElectronic Health Records Systems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
FundersNational Center for Advancing Translational SciencesNational Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health PromotionNational Institute of Neurological Disorders and StrokeNational Institute on Aging
KeywordsEpilepsyWorkflowHealth careElectronic health recordData qualityQuality managementData integrationComputer scienceMedicineData sourceDatabaseMedical emergencyOperations managementEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.072
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.247
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Open science
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: Reproducibility · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.996
Threshold uncertainty score0.379

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0720.247
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.003
Bibliometrics0.0090.011
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0070.009
Open science0.0040.009
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0180.010

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.781
GPT teacher head0.709
Teacher spread0.072 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
DomainReproducibility
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueEpilepsy ResearchSame topicElectronic Health Records SystemsFrench-language works237,207