Mise en évidence de l'infection naturelle des souches et des racines de Douglas par le Fomes après éclaircie
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Heterobasidion was investigated in 50 stumps 20 months after the first thinning in a 17 y.o. Douglas-fir stand planted after the harvest of an unthinned Norway spruce stand. Next the plot was a grand fir plantation severely infected by Heterobasidion with sporophores abundantly present on stumps. No discoloration or decay were present but 19 stumps were infected (38 %). Heterobasidion sp. was present only in sapwood. 45 roots (20-120 cm long) were collected from 9 infected stumps, and 32 roots (70-270 cm) from 8 "uninfected" stumps. 41 roots were infected in the infected stumps, and 2 in one "uninfected" stump. In general, roots were in general entirely colonised ; partial colonisation was always located next to the stump. Results suggest that infection was primarily carried by airborne basidiospores to fresh stumps and infection originating from roots could not be demonstrated. Isolates of Heterobasidion were obtained from sporophores on grandfir and on douglas-fir in an another plantation some hundreds of meters apart and collected from stumps and roots. All the sporophores were H. abietinum. H. abietinum (F) (2/3) and H. annosum stricto sensu (P) (1/3) were detected in the stumps and roots. Roots were also extensively colonised by Armillaria ( A. gallica and A. mellea). / Un jeune peuplement de Douglas ayant subi une première éclaircie en octobre 1997, et jouxtant une importante source d'inoculum naturel, a fourni une opportunité particulièrement intéressante pour étudier l'infection des souches. Un peuplement voisin de sapins de Vancouver (Abien grandis), atteint sévèrement par H. annosum et producteur de nombreux carpophores parfois de grande taille, constituait une source importante d'innoculum aérien naturel susceptible de contaminer la surface fraîche des souches de Douglas voisins, qui se sont donc trouvées dans une situation de fort risque d'infection au moment de l'éclaircie. L'étude a été menée entre 1999 et 2001. On donne les résultats pour ces années.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".