Extraction processes reduce polyphosphate ion migration, dispersion and diffusion as detected with gel electrophoresis and <sup>31</sup>P DOSY NMR
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Inorganic polyphosphates (polyPs) have been identified in eukaryotic and prokaryotic cells alike. Various extraction methods have been optimized as a necessary step before identification and measurement of these polymers. Three commercially available sodium polyP glasses were either dissolved or dissolved and extracted by two commonly used polyP extraction techniques – perchloric acid or buffered phenol–chloroform. The products were separated by polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (PAGE), stained with toluidine blue O, and the migration results quantitatively compared. Both extraction processes reduced the relative migration distances of the peak and leading edges, and the stained band lengths, suggesting reduced polyP migration and dispersion. 31 P diffusion‐ordered spectroscopy nuclear magnetic resonance confirmed that polyP extraction by perchloric acid or phenol–chloroform processes reduced polyP diffusion coefficients and suggested hydrolytic degradation with stronger end‐chain signals. Reduced polyP diffusivity after extraction makes possible an overestimation of synthetic polyP chain length assignment when compared to unextracted polyP ladders with PAGE. The mechanism(s) for reduced synthetic polyP diffusion after extraction and intracellular chemical environment effects on migration are not known.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".