Development of Tourmaline-Bearing Lithologies of the Peraluminous Tusaquillas Composite Granitic Batholith, NW Argentina: Evidence from Quartz and Tourmaline
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT Textural and chemical characteristics of quartz and tourmaline found in tourmaline-rich orbicules, greisens, pegmatites, and tourmalinite segregations associated with the peraluminous leucogranitic Tusaquillas Batholith Complex of northwest Argentina exhibit both magmatic and hydrothermal features. Imaging of quartz by optical cathodoluminescence and scanning electron microscopy cathodoluminescence shows three stages of development. Stage-1 quartz, considered magmatic, develops as large grains in pegmatites that have optical cathodoluminescence homogeneity; as anhedral relict grains partially replaced by stage-2 hydrothermal quartz in tourmalinite segregations, orbicules, and greisens; and as idiomorphic grains with irregularly spaced oscillatory zoning seen in scanning electron microscopy cathodoluminescence in orbicules. Stage-2 quartz, interpreted as hydrothermal, partially replaces stage-1 quartz and generation-1 tourmaline in most lithologies. Stage-3 quartz, a late hydrothermal stage, occurs in all lithologies as weakly luminescing quartz in healed quartz fractures with abundant fluid inclusions, commonly associated with the crystallization of irregular late-stage tourmaline. Multiple generations of tourmaline span magmatic to hydrothermal phases of development. In all lithologies, generation-1 tourmaline is compositionally similar: highly aluminous (range of average values of Altotal = 6.31–6.95 apfu), markedly Fe- and X□-rich (XMg = 0.01–0.17, X□= 0.21–0.51), and having variable F and WO (F = 0.00–0.57 apfu, WO = 0.00–0.40). Generation-1 tourmaline is interpreted as magmatic with compositions reflecting the chemical environment of the host lithologies and with compositional zoning patterns characteristic of both closed- and open-system behavior, possibly related to the transition to subsolidus conditions. Similar to generation-1 tourmaline, later-stage generations-2 and -3 tourmaline compositions are highly aluminous (range of average values of Altotal = 6.38–6.79 apfu), markedly Fe- and X□-rich (XMg = 0.00–0.20, X□= 0.28–0.40), and variably F- and WO-enriched (F = 0.07–0.57 apfu, WO = 0.00–0.31), but notably poorer in Ca and Ti (<0.01 apfu). The later-stage tourmaline is considered to have developed during the subsolidus hydrothermal conditions. External chemical contributions to tourmaline compositions from the country rocks appear to be minor to nonexistent. The X-site and W-site occupancies of the late-generation tourmaline implies subsolidus invasive alkaline, saline aqueous fluids with high Na but minimal Ca contents derived from the crystallizing leucogranites and related rocks across the solidus-to-subsolidus transition.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".