MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4292426440 · doi:10.1139/gen-2022-0037

Identification of the 12-oxophytoeienoic acid reductase (<i>OPR</i>) gene family in pepper (<i>Capsicum annuum</i> L.) and functional characterization of <i>CaOPR6</i> in pepper fruit development and stress response

2022· article· en· W4292426440 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Wen‐Feng Nie, Yue Chen, Junjie Tao, Yu Li, Jianping Liu, Yong Zhou, Youxin Yang

Bibliographic record

VenueGenome · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicPlant biochemistry and biosynthesis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPepperBiologyJasmonic acidGeneCapsicum annuumAbiotic stressArabidopsisBiotic stressAbiotic componentBotanyReductaseGene familySolanaceaeGeneticsHorticultureGenomeEnzymeBiochemistryMutant

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The 12-oxophytoeienoic acid reductase (OPR) is a kind of enzyme in the octadecanoid biosynthesis pathway that determines the biosynthesis of jasmonic acid. Although the roles of OPRs have been extensively studied in several crop plants, little is known about the biological functions of OPR-encoding genes in Capsicum annuum plants. In this study, seven OPR family genes ( CaOPR1–7) were identified from the C. annuum genome. The physical and chemical properties of CaOPR1–7 were further analyzed, including gene expression patterns, promoter elements, and chromosomal locations. The results showed that the seven CaOPR homologues could be divided into two subgroups, and CaOPR6 was highly similar to AtOPR3 in Arabidopsis. The expression of CaOPR6 was significantly induced by various stresses such as cold, salt, and pathogen infection, indicating that CaOPR6 plays important roles in response to abiotic and biotic stresses. Overall, these findings improve the understanding of the biological functions of CaOPR6 in the development of pepper fruit and stress response of pepper plants, and facilitate further studies on the molecular biology of OPR proteins in Solanaceae vegetables.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.355
Threshold uncertainty score0.473

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.184
Teacher spread0.176 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGenomeSame topicPlant biochemistry and biosynthesisFrench-language works237,207