Base material location dependence of corrosion response in friction-stir-welded dissimilar 2024-to-5083 aluminum alloy joints
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The effects of the base material (BM) location on the mechanical properties and the exfoliation corrosion performance of friction-stir-welded (FSWed) dissimilar 2024-to-5083 aluminum alloy joints were investigated. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM), electron backscatter diffraction (EBSD), transmission electron microscopy (TEM), tensile tests and electrochemical experiments were conducted. The results revealed that the BM location had little effect on the tensile properties of the joints. The grain orientation spread (GOS) value of 2024 alloy side was lower than that of 5083 alloy side. Intergranular corrosion occurred mainly on the 2024 alloy side, while the grain interior of the 5083 alloy side was corroded due to the higher GOS value and dislocation density. The FSWed dissimilar joints with a superior exfoliation corrosion resistance could be achieved when the 5083 aluminum alloy with better corrosion performance was positioned on the retreating side.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".