MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4292554535 · doi:10.3390/su141610337

New Algorithm for a Fixed Right Shift Code to Support Different Quality of Services in Smart and Sustainable Optical Networks

2022· article· en· W4292554535 on OpenAlexaff
Somia A. Abd El-Mottaleb, Ahmed Métwalli, Abdellah Chehri, Hassan Yousif Ahmed, Medien Zeghid, Akhtar Nawaz Khan

Bibliographic record

VenueSustainability · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
Topicgraph theory and CDMA systems
Canadian institutionsRoyal Military College of Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceAlgorithmQuality of serviceBit error rateComputer networkTransmission (telecommunications)TelecommunicationsReal-time computingChannel (broadcasting)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Smart and sustainable cities require a network that can ensure many exchanges of information. In this sense, the deployment of optical fiber seems essential in order to guarantee urban interconnection. In this work, a new algorithm for the right shift code to be used in optical fiber communication (OFC) is proposed. The algorithm was designed to support different quality of services (audio, video, and data) for smart cities. This algorithm was based on varying the code weight for a certain number of users and transmitting a service to them. This algorithm was used for a spectral amplitude-coding optical code division multiple-access (SAC-OCDMA) system. Two detection scheme approaches were used, which are the single photodiode (SPD) detection technique and the direct detection (DD) technique. The performance was analytically studied for the proposed system in terms of BER, SNR, and the maximum number of users. The obtained results, when our system used SPD, showed an improvement in the number of users, about 2.5% at 622 Mbps and 1.4% at 1.25 Gbps and 2.5 Gbps. It can support a number of users up to 151 for video services at BER = 10−12, 300 for audio services with BER = 10−3, and 162 for data services at BER = 10−9 at a data rate of 1.25 Gbps. Furthermore, the system was simulated and showed transmission distances of 30 km at 1.25 Gbps and 6 km at 2.5 Gbps for video services, 80 km at 1.25 Gbps and 30 km at 2.5 Gbps for audio services, and 44 km at 1.25 Gbps and 13 km at 2.5 Gbps for data services. Our proposed system is suggested to be implemented in a fixed fifth-generation passive optical network (F5G PON).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.228
Threshold uncertainty score0.818

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.245
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSustainabilitySame topicgraph theory and CDMA systemsFrench-language works237,207