Family Tasks in 3M Plus Behavior with Dengue Hemorrhagic Fever (DHF) Prevention
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: The spread of dengue hemorrhagic fever can be caused by many factors, one of which is the lack of family duties in preventing. This study aimed to know the role of the family in preventing dengue hemorrhagic fever in the community. Methods: The research design used was observational using cross sectional method and using a questionnaire sheet instrument. The population in this study were 45 respondents. The sample size is 45 respondents using total sampling technique, while to determine the relationship between variables used Spearman rank test with a significant level of 0.05.Results: The results showed that almost all (33%) had not performed the 3M Plus Behavior. The results of the Spearman rank statistical test simultaneously have a family task relationship in 3M Plus behavior with a significant value = 0.000 < 0.05, then reject H0. While the individual test only family tasks that affect the behavior of 3M Plus with p value = 0.035 < 0.05.Conclusion: Family tasks affect the behavior of 3M Plus with dengue hemorrhagic fever prevention because the family has done five forms of family tasks. In the future, the family will be able to carry out 3M plus behavior and try to deal with it appropriately through five forms of family tasks
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.016 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it