MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4292571941 · doi:10.1139/cjp-2022-0056

Spin-resolved electronic, magnetic, and thermodynamic properties of perovskites XTiO<sub>3</sub> (X = Rb, Cs) using GGA, TB-mBJ, and GGA + <i>U</i> potentials: a DFT approach

2022· article· en· W4292571941 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
M. Mohamed Sheik Sirajuddeen, S. Beer Mohamed, N. Hajara Beevi, V. Ashwin, Ikram Un Nabi Lone

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Physics · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicHeusler alloys: electronic and magnetic properties
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCondensed matter physicsCurie temperaturePhysicsMagnetic momentFerromagnetismDensity functional theoryDebye modelHydrostatic pressureAnisotropySpin (aerodynamics)DebyeThermodynamicsQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Half-metallic ferromagnetism is reported in RbTiO 3 and CsTiO 3 compounds under the exchange-correlation functions GGA, TB-mBJ, and GGA + U using the full-potential linearized augmented plane wave method. Spin-resolved calculations were carried out and implemented within the framework of density functional theory. The compounds exhibit energy band gap in the spin-up direction using three functionals of PBE-GGA, TB-mBJ, and GGA + U. A larger band gap is predicted to occur in both the compounds with the use of TB-mBJ potential. A higher value of magnetic moment is evidenced for RbTiO 3 and CsTiO 3 using the PBE-GGA method as compared to the mBJ and GGA + U methods. The Curie temperature was determined for the compounds at equilibrium and reduced volumes. It is reported that the Curie temperature increases with the increase in hydrostatic pressure. With the help of second-order elastic constants, the Debye temperature and anisotropy factor were predicted for the compounds.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.066
Threshold uncertainty score0.903

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.187
Teacher spread0.173 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of PhysicsSame topicHeusler alloys: electronic and magnetic propertiesFrench-language works237,207