MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4292573084 · doi:10.3390/sym14081735

Review of Model Predictive Control of Distributed Energy Resources in Microgrids

2022· article· en· W4292573084 on OpenAlexaff
Darioush Razmi, Oluleke Babayomi, Alireza Davari, Tohid Rahimi, Yuntao Miao, Zhenbin Zhang

Bibliographic record

VenueSymmetry · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMicrogrid Control and Optimization
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
FundersNatural Science Foundation of Shandong ProvinceShenzhen Fundamental Research ProgramGovernment of Jiangsu ProvinceNatural Science Foundation of Jiangsu ProvinceNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsDistributed generationRenewable energyModel predictive controlComputer sciencePhotovoltaic systemReliability (semiconductor)GridDistributed computingWind powerEnergy storageReliability engineeringControl (management)EngineeringElectrical engineeringPower (physics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In recent years, in response to increasing environmental concerns, advances in renewable energy technology and reduced costs have caused a significant increase in the penetration of distributed generation resources in distribution networks. Nonetheless, the connection of distributed generation resources to distribution networks has created new challenges in the control, operation, and management of network reliability. This article is a review on the model predictive control (MPC) for distributed energy resources (DER) in microgrids. The solutions of MPC for energy conversion of solar photovoltaic, wind, and energy storage systems are covered in detail. MPC’s applications for increasing reliability of grid-connected converters under (a)symmetrical grid faults are also discussed. The promising potentials of the applications of MPC to the stable multi-variable control performance of DERs are highlighted. This work reflects strong symmetry on MPC control strategies and provides guidance map for readers to facilitate future research works in these exciting fields.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.183
Teacher spread0.179 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations27
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSymmetrySame topicMicrogrid Control and OptimizationFrench-language works237,207