MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

John Tyndall

2022· reference-entry· en· W4292605236 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typereference-entry
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHistory of Science and Natural History
Canadian institutionsYork University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIrishInstitutionHistoryArt historyMedia studiesSociologyLawPolitical sciencePhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

John Tyndall (b. c. 1820–d. 1893) was one of the most influential scientists of the Victorian era. Born in Leighlinbridge, County Carlow, Ireland, Tyndall’s father (also John) was a struggling shoemaker and leather dealer. In 1839 John Jr. joined the Irish Ordinance Survey as a civil assistant. In August 1842 he was transferred to the English Survey in Preston but dismissed in November 1843 when he protested the inefficiency of the Survey’s administration and its unfairness to the Irish assistants. In August 1847 he accepted an appointment as teacher of mathematics at Queenwood College in Hampshire but left after one year to earn his doctoral degree at Marburg University, Germany. He returned to England in 1851, taking up his old position at Queenwood while he looked for a scientific post. In 1853 he was elected Professor of Natural Philosophy of the Royal Institution, where he remained for the rest of his scientific career. Tyndall’s climb up the social ladder from humble family circumstances was capped in spectacular fashion when, in 1867, he succeeded Michael Faraday as Superintendent of the Royal Institution. Tyndall’s life cannot be summed up so simply. He lived several interconnected lives. The first was spent primarily in his laboratory at the Royal Institution; the second he spent with mountain guides, suspended high on the sides of alpine peaks; and the third was either in front of fashionable audiences or behind the scenes, directing and shaping the sciences of the day. Along with being one of the premier physicists in the nineteenth century, John Tyndall was also one of the figures largely responsible for the growth of mountaineering as a sport. He narrowly missed being the first to summit the Matterhorn, then thought to be entirely inaccessible. Mountaineering was not merely a sport to Tyndall; he conducted important scientific experiments whenever he climbed. Owing to his flamboyant lecturing style, he also became well known as an eloquent public speaker on science to fashionable audiences. Along with biologist T. H. Huxley, philosopher Herbert Spencer, and botanist J. D. Hooker, Tyndall sought to professionalize science, arguing that naturalistic, rather than theistic, explanations could (and should) account for the workings of nature. They also defended Darwin during the debates about evolution. This influential group of scientists formed the X Club in 1864 in an attempt to direct the course of British science and to lobby for its support in the halls of government.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.396
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.3980.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.050
GPT teacher head0.229
Teacher spread0.180 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicHistory of Science and Natural HistoryFrench-language works237,207