MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4292616164 · doi:10.1017/jfm.2022.661

Turbulent separations beneath semi-submerged bluff bodies with smooth and rough undersurfaces

2022· article· en· W4292616164 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Fluid Mechanics · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFluid Dynamics and Vibration Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanadian Network for Research and Innovation in Machining Technology, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanada Foundation for InnovationManitoba Hydro
KeywordsVortexReynolds numberMechanicsVortex sheddingParticle image velocimetrySandpaperHorseshoe vortexLeading edgePhysicsTurbulenceFlow separationSurface finishMaterials scienceGeologyVortex ringComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The spatio-temporal characteristics of turbulent separations beneath semi-submerged bluff bodies with different undersurface roughness conditions are studied using a time-resolved particle image velocimetry. The Reynolds number based on the free-stream velocity and submergence depth was fixed to 14 400. Three different undersurface conditions – smooth, sandpaper roughness and cube roughness – were examined. The results showed that wall roughness reduces the mean reattachment length, and suppresses the Reynolds stresses in the second half of the mean separation bubble. The Kelvin–Helmholtz instability is observed at the leading edge of the smooth bluff body, but is bypassed in the rough cases. In the first half of the mean separation bubble, the frequencies in the separated shear layer migrate to lower values in a discrete manner through the vortex pairing mechanism. Consequently, multiple vortex shedding motions at different frequencies are nested in the separated shear layer, and the cores of shed vortices are aligned near the isopleth of free-stream velocity. The shed vortex is accompanied with multiple vortices along the edge of mean flow reversal in the upstream locations. These vortices are influenced significantly by wall roughness. A low-frequency flapping motion manifests as enlargement/shrinkage of reverse flow areas in the first half of the mean separation bubble. The frequencies of flapping motion in the smooth and sandpaper cases are similar, but are relatively lower than that in the cube roughness case. This flapping motion is associated with an extremely large vortex shed from the mean reattachment point to the free-stream region.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.199
Threshold uncertainty score0.452

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.198
Teacher spread0.190 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it