MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4292621666 · doi:10.1177/0309364615591101

Abstract Book

2015· article· en· W4292621666 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueProsthetics and Orthotics International · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicProsthetics and Rehabilitation Robotics
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Clubfoot is commonest congenital deformity in babies. More than 100,000 babies born worldwide each year with Clubfoot. The main goal is to achieve a functional. pain free, planti-grade foot with good mobility. Treatment of idiopathic CTEV is serial gentle manipulations and after casting, splinting/bracing to maintain the correction. The main reason of relapse of deformity after conecticn is non-compliance to bracing program as it is a lengthy process. Aim: The aim of study is to develop a standard, light weight 8. cost effective Foot Abduction Brace to address the issues of non-compliance and to check its effectiveness. Method: It was 3 years non randomized interventional study from April 2011 to March 2014 with convenient sampling. Sample size was 1 10 patients using Dennis Brown and AORI Foot Abduction Brace were divided 'n study and control group. 30 patients using AORI Foot Abduction Brace were included in study group where as 80 patients using Dennis Brown Splint was included in control group. Study was performed at Department of Orthotics & Prosthetics of Benazir Bhutto Hospital Rawalpindi. Results: Deformity relapsed in 15% of patients in control group no relapsed was reponed in study group where P- value was <.05 that is significant. Skin damage occurred in almost 50% of patients in control group it was reported about 20% in study group with P-value = <.05 which is significant. Residual adduction was reported in >50% of patients in control goup and it was reported 0% in study group with P-value = <.001 which is highly significant. Fabrication Cost of AORI Foot Abduction Brace was is atnost half of the DB Splint. No leather and steel work is required so that an Orthotist can make it easily. It can also industriaize and easily adustable by the families. Discussion & Conclusion Clinical trials of AOFtI FAB showed very good results in maintenance of corrected CTEV as the families are more compliant with AOFtl FAB because it is light in weight have dynamic effects far Dorsi-flexion while Dennis Brown splint is relatively heavy and found poor to maintain Dorsi-flexion that leads to the relapse of equinus. Skin damage is also less in AORI FAB and it is cost effective with ease to fabricate without extensive work.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.634
Threshold uncertainty score0.388

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.229
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProsthetics and Orthotics InternationalSame topicProsthetics and Rehabilitation RoboticsFrench-language works237,207