Cavity-enhanced field-resolved spectroscopy
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Femtosecond enhancement cavities 1 are key to applications including high-sensitivity linear 2–4 and nonlinear 5,6 gas spectroscopy, as well as efficient nonlinear optical frequency conversion 7–10 . Yet, to date, the broadest simultaneously enhanced bandwidths amount to <20% of the central optical frequency 8,9,11–15 . Here, we present an ultrabroadband femtosecond enhancement cavity comprising gold-coated mirrors and a wedged-diamond-plate input coupler, with an average finesse of 55 for optical frequencies below 40 THz and exceeding 40 in the 120–300 THz range. Resonant enhancement of a 50-MHz-repetition-rate offset-free frequency comb spanning 22–40 THz results in a waveform-stable ultrashort circulating pulse with a spectrum supporting a Fourier limit of 1.6 cycles, enabling time-domain electric-field-resolved spectroscopy of molecular samples with temporally separated excitation and molecular response 16 . The contrast between the two is improved by taking advantage of destructive interference at the input coupler. At an effective interaction length with a gas of up to 81 m, this concept promises parts-per-trillion-level ultrabroadband electric-field-resolved linear and nonlinear spectroscopy of impulsively excited molecular vibrations.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it