MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4292641249 · doi:10.1038/s41566-022-01057-0

Cavity-enhanced field-resolved spectroscopy

2022· article· en· W4292641249 on OpenAlexafffund
Philipp Sulzer, Maximilian Högner, Ann-Kathrin Raab, Lukas Fürst, Ernst E. Fill, Daniel Gerz, Christina Höfer, Liudmila Voronina, Ioachim Pupeza

Bibliographic record

VenueNature Photonics · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAdvanced Fiber Laser Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersInternational Max Planck Research School for Advanced Methods in Process and Systems EngineeringUniversity of TokyoCanada First Research Excellence FundMax-Planck-GesellschaftBundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung
KeywordsFemtosecondSpectroscopyOpticsMaterials scienceFrequency combTerahertz radiationElectric fieldExcitationOptoelectronicsLaserPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Femtosecond enhancement cavities1 are key to applications including high-sensitivity linear2–4 and nonlinear5,6 gas spectroscopy, as well as efficient nonlinear optical frequency conversion7–10. Yet, to date, the broadest simultaneously enhanced bandwidths amount to <20% of the central optical frequency8,9,11–15. Here, we present an ultrabroadband femtosecond enhancement cavity comprising gold-coated mirrors and a wedged-diamond-plate input coupler, with an average finesse of 55 for optical frequencies below 40 THz and exceeding 40 in the 120–300 THz range. Resonant enhancement of a 50-MHz-repetition-rate offset-free frequency comb spanning 22–40 THz results in a waveform-stable ultrashort circulating pulse with a spectrum supporting a Fourier limit of 1.6 cycles, enabling time-domain electric-field-resolved spectroscopy of molecular samples with temporally separated excitation and molecular response16. The contrast between the two is improved by taking advantage of destructive interference at the input coupler. At an effective interaction length with a gas of up to 81 m, this concept promises parts-per-trillion-level ultrabroadband electric-field-resolved linear and nonlinear spectroscopy of impulsively excited molecular vibrations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.252
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations19
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNature PhotonicsSame topicAdvanced Fiber Laser TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207