MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4292670886 · doi:10.1101/2022.08.18.504389

Evolutionary analysis in <i>Enterobacterales</i> of the Rcs-repressor protein IgaA unveils two cytoplasmic small β-barrel domains central for function

2022· preprint· en· W4292670886 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Leticia Rodrı́guez, Marcos Peñalver, Patricia Casino, Francisco Garcı́a-del Portillo

Bibliographic record

VenuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · 2022
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGenomics and Phylogenetic Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersCentro Nacional de BiotecnologíaInstitute of GeneticsMinisterio de Ciencia e InnovaciónUniversity College CorkUniversidad de Sevilla
KeywordsBiologyPeriplasmic spaceProtein Data Bank (RCSB PDB)Salmonella entericaProtein domainBacterial outer membraneConserved sequenceGeneticsComputational biologyPeptide sequenceEscherichia coliBiochemistryGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT The Rcs sensor system, comprised by the proteins RcsB/RcsC/RcsD and RcsF, is used by bacteria of the order Enterobacterales to withstand envelope damage. Under non-stress conditions, the system is repressed by the membrane protein IgaA. How IgaA has evolved within Enterobacterales in concert with the Rcs system has not been explored. Here, we report phylogenetic data supporting co-evolution of IgaA with the inner membrane proteins RcsC and RcsD. Functional assays showed that IgaA from representative genera as Shigella and Dickeya , but not those from Yersinia or the endosymbionts Photorhabdus and Sodalis , repress the Rcs system when expressed in a heterogenous host like Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium. IgaA structural features have therefore diverged among Enterobacterales . Modelling of IgaA structure unveiled one periplasmic and two cytoplasmic β-rich architectures forming partially-closed small β-barrel (SBB) domains related to OB (oligonucleotide/oligosaccharide binding motif) fold domains. Interactions among conserved residues were mapped in a connector linking SBB-1 domain of cytoplasmic region cyt1 to SBB-2 domain of region cyt2 (residues E180-R265); the C-terminus of cyt1 facing cyt2 (R188-E194-D309 and T191-H326); and, between cyt2-cyt3 regions (H293-E328-R686). These interactions identify a previously unnoticed "hybrid" SBB-2 domain. We also identified interactions absent in the IgaA variants not functional in S. Typhimurium, including H192-P249, which links cyt1 to cyt2, R255-D313 and D287-R314. A short α-helix (α6) located in the SSB-1 domain is also missing in the non-complementing IgaA tested. Taken together, our data support a central role of the two cytoplasmic SBB domains in IgaA function and evolution. SIGNIFICANCE The "intracellular growth attenuator A" protein (IgaA) was first reported as repressor of the Rcs system in S. enterica serovar Typhimurium. IgaA orthologs were later studied in other genera and families of the Enterobacterales order, mainly in Escherichia coli . Despite intense investigation about the mechanism by which IgaA controls the Rcs system, the extent at which IgaA evolved within families of the Enterobacterales order has not been investigated. Using a combination of functional assays and in silico structural analyses, our work provides a detail map of conserved and divergent residues in IgaA representing interactions occurring in all Enterobacterales and others that may have diverged concomitantly to interacting proteins, probably for responding to specific environments. Future studies involving mutagenesis of these residues in IgaA of Enterobacterales families and genera of interest will certainly provide valuable insights into the regulation acting in the IgaA-Rcs axis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.203
Teacher spread0.194 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)→Same topicGenomics and Phylogenetic Studies→French-language works237,207→