MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4292682937 · doi:10.1038/s41598-022-18345-y

Risk factors of early pulmonary hypertension and its clinical outcomes in preterm infants: a systematic review and meta-analysis

2022· review· en· W4292682937 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Yoo Jinie Kim, Seung Han Shin, Hye Won Park, Ee‐Kyung Kim, Han‐Suk Kim

Bibliographic record

VenueScientific Reports · 2022
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicNeonatal Respiratory Health Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersKonkuk UniversitySeoul National UniversityKonkuk University Medical Center
KeywordsMedicineBronchopulmonary dysplasiaOdds ratioMeta-analysisConfidence intervalPediatricsCochrane LibraryIncidence (geometry)Cohort studyObservational studyBirth weightLow birth weightInternal medicineGestational agePregnancy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The aim of this meta-analysis was to determine the incidence and risk factors of early pulmonary hypertension (PHT) in preterm infants and evaluate the association of early PHT with morbidities such as bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD), late PHT, and in-hospital mortality. We searched the PubMed (1980–2021), Embase (1968–2021), CINAHL (2002–2021), Cochrane library (1989–2021), and KoreaMed (1993–2021). Observational studies on the association between early PHT diagnosed within the first 2 weeks after birth and its clinical outcomes in preterm infants born before 37 weeks of gestation or with very low birth weight (< 1500 g) were included. Two authors independently extracted the data and assessed the quality of each study using a modified Newcastle–Ottawa Scale. We performed meta-analysis using Comprehensive Meta-Analysis version 3.3. A total of 1496 potentially relevant studies were found, of which 8 studies (7 cohort studies and 1 case–control study) met the inclusion criteria comprising 1435 preterm infants. The event rate of early PHT was 24% (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.174–0.310). The primary outcome of our study was moderate to severe BPD at 36 weeks postmenstrual age, and it was associated with early PHT (6 studies; odds ratio [OR] 1.682; 95% CI 1.262–2.241; P < 0.001; heterogeneity: I2 = 0%; P = 0.492). Preterm infants with early PHT had higher OR of in-hospital mortality (6 studies; OR 2.372; 95% CI 1.595–3.528; P < 0.001; heterogeneity: I2 = 0%; P = 0.811) and developing late PHT diagnosed after 4 weeks of life (4 studies; OR 2.877; 95% CI 1.732–4.777; P < 0.001; heterogeneity: I2 = 0%; P = 0.648). Infants with oligohydramnios (4 studies; OR 2.134; 95% CI 1.379–3.303; P = 0.001) and those who were small-for-gestational-age (5 studies; OR 1.831; 95% CI 1.160–2.890; P = 0.009) had an elevated risk of developing early PHT. This study showed that early PHT is significantly associated with mortality and morbidities, such as BPD and late PHT. Preterm infants with a history of oligohydramnios and born small-for-gestational-age are at higher risk for developing early PHT; however, high-quality studies that control for confounders are necessary.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.012
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.026
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Meta-analysis · Consensus signal: Meta-analysis
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.024
Threshold uncertainty score0.063

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0120.026
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0240.047
Bibliometrics0.0070.007
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.002
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.296
GPT teacher head0.476
Teacher spread0.180 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designMeta-analysis
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations30
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueScientific Reports→Same topicNeonatal Respiratory Health Research→French-language works237,207→