MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4292702987 · doi:10.1136/emermed-2022-999.19

PP19 Advances in community paramedicine in response to COVID-19

2022· article· en· W4292702987 on OpenAlexaffabout
Alan M Batt, Amber Hultink, Chelsea Lanos, Barbara Tierney, Mathieu Grenier, Julia Heffern

Bibliographic record

VenueEmergency Medicine Journal · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCOVID-19 and healthcare impacts
Canadian institutionsQueen's UniversityResearch CanadaFanshawe College
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineContext (archaeology)Grey literatureNursingSocial connectednessConceptual frameworkCommunity engagementPublic relationsMEDLINEPsychologySociologyPolitical scienceSocial psychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background Already well situated in the community, paramedics work collaboratively with other community partners to ensure patients receive the services that they require and the high quality in-home and in-community care they deserve. The ongoing COVID-19 pandemic has highlighted the prevalence of social inequities in Canada, particularly in already marginalized groups, and the importance of social connectedness and caregiver wellbeing solutions. We sought to explore innovations in community paramedicine programs across Canada in response to COVID-19. Methods We conducted a scoping literature review of community paramedicine publications since 2020, with a focus on Canadian context, and undertook semi-structured interviews with key informants to capture innovations that may not be well represented in the literature. Results A total of 22 studies, combined with 26 grey literature sources were identified through the literature search. We interviewed ten stakeholders from diverse community care and community paramedicine settings across Canada to further explore each element of the conceptual framework. A conceptual framework (Figure 1) was developed to categorize the literature and findings into themes, namely: leveraging technology (e.g., virtual consultations, remote monitoring); responding to COVID-19 (e.g., mass testing and vaccination); addressing social needs (e.g., home visits, helping patients with groceries); caring for vulnerable populations (e.g., providing palliative care at home). These innovations were united in the idea of collaborating with other health care professionals and agencies, while facilitating care and case management coordination. Conclusions The COVID-19 pandemic has highlighted the essential collaborative care role community paramedicine programs can provide to patients in their homes or communities. Community paramedicine programs have evolved to meet the needs of their communities. These programs have demonstrated their ability to support public health measures, provide home and community-based care, and most importantly, collaborate with other health care professionals in coordinating and providing care to Canadians regardless of social circumstances.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.014
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.016
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.252
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0140.016
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0410.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.129
GPT teacher head0.497
Teacher spread0.368 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEmergency Medicine JournalSame topicCOVID-19 and healthcare impactsFrench-language works237,207