Salmon DNA Combination for Hypertrohic Scar Treatment with Diabetes Mellitus Type 2: A Case Report
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: Hypertrophic scar is a problem of wound healing process. Salmon DNA (Polydeoxyribonucleotide/PDRN) is a mixture of deoxyribonucleotide gonads derivate of Oncorhynchus mykiss (Rainbow Salmon) that helps wound healing process and preventing the formation of scars. Methods: A diabetic 30-year-old man with 5x3 cm hypertrophic scar on his dorsal hand since 10 months. The hypertrophic scar had been treated with ointments and Triamcinolone 10mg/ml every 2 weeks for 2 months. The patient was treated with intradermal injection 2% Polydeoxyribonucleotide (PDRN) in 2.7 ml (PDRN Bellavita®) and topical therapy containing Allium cepa extract and Vitamin E (Lanakeloid®) every 12 hours. PDRN was injected intradermal into the whole area of the scar using a 30-G Needle at a dose of 0.05 ml at each injection site with a distance of about 0.5-1.0 cm. PDRN was given every 2 weeks for 3 months. Vancouver Scar Scale was used to asses hypertrophic scar treatment progress. Results: The Vancouver Scar Scale was downgrading from 10 to 3 in 3 months. Conclusion: The combination of PDRN injection with topical administration of Allium cepa and vitamin E, is effective for hypertrophic scar treatment.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".