MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4292764315 · doi:10.1101/2022.08.22.504858

Inferring single-cell transcriptomic dynamics with structured latent gene expression dynamics

2022· preprint· en· W4292764315 on OpenAlexaff
Spencer Farrell, Madhav Mani, Sidhartha Goyal

Bibliographic record

VenuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · 2022
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicSingle-cell and spatial transcriptomics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceEmbeddingInferenceTrajectoryDynamics (music)Artificial intelligencePhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Gene expression dynamics provide directional information for trajectory inference from single-cell RNA-sequencing data. Traditional approaches compute local RNA velocity using strict assumptions about the equations describing transcription and splicing of RNA. Not surprisingly, these approaches fail where these assumptions are violated, such as in multiple lineages with distinct gene dynamics or time-dependent kinetic rates of transcription and splicing. In this work we present “LatentVelo”, a novel approach to compute a low-dimensional representation of gene dynamics with deep learning. Our approach embeds cells into a latent space with a variational auto-encoder, and describes differentiation dynamics on this latent space with neural ordinary differential equations. These more general dynamics enable accurate trajectory inference, and the latent space approach enables the generation of a latent “dynamics-based” embedding of cell states. To model multiple distinct lineages, LatentVelo infers a latent regulatory state that controls the dynamics of an individual cell. With these lineage-specific dynamics LatentVelo can predict latent trajectories, describing global inferred developmental path for individual cells, rather than just outputting local RNA velocity vectors. The dynamics-based embedding also enables concurrent batch correction of cell states and RNA velocity, outperforming comparable auto-encoder based batch correction methods that do not consider gene expression dynamics. Finally, the flexible structure of LatentVelo enables additional of new regulatory constraints required to integrate multiomic data. LatentVelo is available at https://github.com/Spencerfar/LatentVelo .

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.017
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.192
Teacher spread0.182 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)Same topicSingle-cell and spatial transcriptomicsFrench-language works237,207