Robust Distributed Sensor Fault Detection and Diagnosis Within Formation Control of Multiagent Systems
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper investigates the fault detection and diagnosis (FDD) problem for multiagent systems subject to sensor faults and disturbances. A distributed proportional integral derivative formation control protocol is constructed to achieve practical formation. A distributed FDD scheme, comprised of a fault detection module, a fault isolation module, and a fault estimation module, is designed within the formation control. For fault detection, the relationship between residuals and sensor faults in the multiagent systems is established such that each agent can detect the faults of all agents. For fault isolation, the distributed observer in each agent can determine whether the fault is in itself or its neighbors. Utilizing the absolute output information of each agent and the relative output information among neighboring agents, a distributed fault estimator is derived to provide the fault magnitude information. Simulation results are presented to demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed FDD scheme.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it