MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Epileptic Seizure Detection Using Convolution Neural Networks

2022· article· en· W4292874177 on OpenAlexaff
William Sukaria, James Malasa, Shiu Kumar, Rahul Kumar, Mansour H. Assaf, Voicu Groza, Emil M. Petriu, Sunil R. Das

Bibliographic record

Venue2022 IEEE International Symposium on Medical Measurements and Applications (MeMeA) · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicEEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEpilepsyConvolution (computer science)Computer scienceArtificial neural networkPattern recognition (psychology)Artificial intelligencePopulationElectroencephalographyScalpConvolutional neural networkEpileptic seizureNeurosciencePsychologyMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Epilepsy is a central nervous system disorder that affects a substantial number of world's population and disrupts the quality of life of the sufferers. A number of diagnostic techniques evolved over the years for the detection of epileptic seizures using encephalograms. The subject paper presents design and implementation of a classification model based on convolution neural networks that is capable of detecting epileptic seizures using computational methods utilizing encephalogram data. The study used convolution neural networks that have unique characteristics for recognizing patterns and images and in classifying their features. The neural network architecture proposed herein comprises of layers for input and output with several hidden convolution layers. The electroencephalogram database that was used in this work is the freely accessible CHB-MIT scalp encephalogram database. The developed approach was implemented using the 22 subject database and testing was carried out on patients a few days after the withdrawal of the anti-seizure medications. The test subjects were composed of 5 males and 17 females from various age groups. It was observed that the suggested algorithm could detect about 94.6 percent of the 198 tested seizure records, indicating a good performance of the proposed seizure detection algorithm.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.739
Threshold uncertainty score0.796

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.053
GPT teacher head0.303
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue2022 IEEE International Symposium on Medical Measurements and Applications (MeMeA)Same topicEEG and Brain-Computer InterfacesFrench-language works237,207