MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4292939212 · doi:10.5539/gjhs.v14n9p29

Responding to Post-School Education Policy Reforms: A Case Study on the Incorporation of Nursing Colleges into the Post-School Education and Training System of South Africa

2022· article· en· W4292939212 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Nonhlanhla Makhanya, Vhothusa Edward Matahela, Gcinile Buthelezi

Bibliographic record

VenueGlobal Journal of Health Science · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEducation, Leadership, and Health Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersDepartment of Higher Education and TrainingDivision of ChemistryCouncil for Higher EducationCoordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível SuperiorNational Eye InstituteU.S. Department of Energy
KeywordsNurse educationAccreditationNursingOfficerLegislationNursing researchMedicineHigher educationService (business)Political scienceMedical educationBusiness

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Amongst the diverse providers of nursing education in South Africa, public nursing colleges have over the years produced 80% of pipeline nursing professionals. The demand imposed by the reorganisation of health services toward universal health coverage, together with the recent changes to the post-school legislation introduced by the Department of Higher Education and Training has required a repositioning of nursing colleges within the new milieu. If public nursing colleges did not comply with post-school education prescripts, they would not be eligible to offer programmes that are aligned to the Higher Education Qualification Sub-framework. The purpose of this article is to provide an account on progress and lessons learnt towards repositioning public nursing colleges within the new higher education milieu as a legal requirement for offering new nursing programmes leading to registration in any of the new nursing categories prescribed in the Nursing Act. The National Department of Health has, through the stewardship of its Chief Nursing Officer facilitated an intense process from 2016 to 2019 of preparing public nursing colleges to meet the requirements for accreditation as higher education institutions. Chief among these activities was the development of a national policy for nursing education informed by and designed around health service demands and underpinned by higher education principles to direct provisioning of nursing education and training. Parallel to the policy, the state of readiness of public nursing colleges was measured against the Council for Higher Education determined criteria for programme accreditation. Lessons emanating from this process are being used to accelerate preparation for accreditation of programmes leading to professional qualifications in nursing and other related health sciences programmes offered at college level to ensure sustained production of nurses with requisite skills mix required for a responsive health care system.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.016
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.063
Threshold uncertainty score0.132

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.016
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0210.008
Scholarly communication0.0070.005
Open science0.0020.007
Research integrity0.0050.007
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.122
GPT teacher head0.477
Teacher spread0.355 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGlobal Journal of Health ScienceSame topicEducation, Leadership, and Health ResearchFrench-language works237,207