Digital marketing, digital orientation, marketing capability, and information technology capability on marketing performance of Indonesian SMEs
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This research analyzes the effect of digital marketing, digital orientation, marketing capabilities, and information technology capabilities on marketing performance of Indonesian SMEs. The methods are quantitative methods and data analysis techniques using AMOS 23 software based on Structural Equation Modeling (SEM). The method of selecting the sample uses the purposive sampling methods. The study uses data based on questionnaires to 338 SMEs respondents in Madura, Indonesia. The results of data analysis show that the digital marketing had a positive and significant effect on the marketing performance, the digital orientation had a positive and significant effect on the marketing performance, marketing capabilities had a positive and significant effect on the marketing performance and information technology capabilities had a positive and significant effect on the marketing performance. The theoretical implication of the research is that it finds additional knowledge of marketing strategy in the field of small medium enterprise. Then, marketing management by integrating marketing capabilities and information technology to optimize digital marketing on SMEs marketing performance.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.013 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.007 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it